I already gathered my livetweets about TEDxUSC, made a screenshot and tweeted it:
And I also had to tweet how I did that:
Meta-tweeting? Meta-meta-tweeting?
But I also wanted to annotate these tweets.
It's amazing/ridonkulous that you can't just search & pull all the tweets you want, and then wrap a commentary/discussion around them.
But there it is. Twitter is still evolving.
So that's what I did below: pulled my and others' tweets together and annotated a tiny bit.
This is not a complete discussion of the event, just some highlights--with links.
(And if you want to see another Tweet summary, check out one of the best livetweeters there: snidelyhazel. I also mention coachkays below, so here are his #TEDxUSC tweets.)
Big Themes.
- Participation. Getting involved feels good.
- Help others. This feels good, too. It's not square. There's some new impulse towards altruism. Maybe after the Great Recession, we understand its value more.
- Doing and making. These feel good, too. And it needn't be digital, electronic, computerized or 2.0.
- Re-use, economize, invent. It's not only ecological to re-use, it's smart, requires smartness, and can help others.
- Value. What do we value? Who creates it? Who gets to share in it? Our society seems to be going back to fundamentals here.
Talks, Performances, Movies
I was worried before the event started: they lost my registration, and people were tweeting about their VIP status (which I tried to parody).
(And I wasn't the only one whose registration was lost.)
"Oh no," I thought: "another way for people to feel superior."
But that quickly went away.
Steve Connell did a wonderful monologue: a memory of learning from his mom and dad, their insights and hardships, that superheroes fight everyday struggles--including and especially to help others.
- Whom do we lionize?
- Whom do we revere?
- Billionaires because they are billionaires?
- Or when they create value and connect people--no matter how much they earn?
(Warning: if you go to his personal web site, you get re-routed to some media-heavy page that takes forever to load and may well crash your browser. Be forewarned.)
The session quickly moved to a sing-along: basically the room got divided into parts and taught some harmony.
This underlined a running themes: social action, doing things and doing them together, participation, a greater good.
On this topic, Jose Antonio Rosa talked about the poorest people in the world not as an emerging market (as I first thought he was saying) but as inventors and creators of value.
Pomona basketball coach Brian Kays (among the best live-tweeters on the premises) insightfully pointed to the less-is-more aspect of this talk. We are so distracted by technology and newness that we collapse the two. What if the greatest invention used rubber bands and bailing wire?
Rosa also underlined the importance of hope: that without hope there is no creativity. Hope may be a delusion, but it is a healthy one.
(He also pointed out that creativity can be illegal, violent and inimical, too: this wasn't a greeting card.)
USC professor Josh Kun (casually dressed in jeans and a plaid shirt) talked about music and borders--notably our border with Mexico.
Most interesting, I thought, was his description of deejay parties where participants can have the deejay shout out the names of distant (even dead or missing) loved ones--then buy a CD of the shout-out.
Maybe I spelled the name of this kind of party wrong. Kun called them 'transnational messaging events':
Rick Nahmias from Food Forward explained how gleaning unpicked backyard fruit could feed our hungriest, notably farm workers who themselves are poorly paid--fruitanthropy.
This is also a tax deduction for the homeowner!
Rick N. called it win-win-win-win: food pantries get food that's fresh and wholesom, homeowners get a tax break, volunteers participate, and hungry people get fed.
(Where is our next Cesar Chavez, I wonder?)
One screening was a short film shot entirely on an iPhone4--and edited on it too (at least the rough cut).
The fact of the technology produced more ooh's and ah's than the film, which is interesting. But I think this set up very powerfully the message: technology can lower the bar for skillful media content-creation.
Against the tendency to fetishize computer technology, Dale Dougherty showed actual physical objects--some even without batteries!
His "slides" were hand-made pieces of cardboard with letters cut out of them.
He used salty Play Dough to make electrical circuits, and he built up to using an Arduino processor.
These were low-tech but joyful devices. He sang the praises of simplicity, play, productivity and poverty, even.
Behind social media, which can seem alienating and distancing, there is a deep desire to CONNECT. You could see it at TEDxUSC in the opening participatory sing-a-long.
Annenberg graduate Aram Sinnreich proposed the design requirements for a network that belongs to citizens, not phone providers or the government.
Jennifer Pahlka described a project in which programmers work for a year doing small projects for local government.
I could go on about this one for hours, so I'll have to make it a separate blog post.
Elisabeth Stock explained what a student-centered education looks like--including helping parents have a clear role and not expecting teachers to make learning appear from nowhere.
Her organization offers hundreds of digital assets for teachers, parents and kids to access.
And she told a charming story about a teacher realizing that play could be part of learning, not a distraction.
This is the kind of 'a-ha' moment we need more of.
There was more. But I found these speakers and ideas very compelling.
--E. R. O'Neill